Cleared Traditional

K132323 - RS-3000 ADVANCE

K132323 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for RS-3000 ADVANCE by Nidek Co., Ltd.. It is a Class 2 Ophthalmic device (product code OBO) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 209-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2014
Decision
209d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K132323 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the RS-3000 ADVANCE. Classified as Tomography, Optical Coherence (product code OBO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Nidek Co., Ltd. (Wadsworth, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 19, 2014 after a review of 209 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.1570 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ophthalmic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Nidek Co., Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K132323 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 25, 2013
Decision Date February 19, 2014
Days to Decision 209 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
99d slower than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 209d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code OBO Tomography, Optical Coherence
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.1570
Definition Viewing, Imaging, Measurement, And Analysis Of Ocular Structures. Diagnostic Device To Aid In The Detection And Management Of Various Ocular Diseases.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.