Cleared Traditional

K133011 - DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA GRAFT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General & Plastic Surgery device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 2014
Decision
268d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K133011 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA GRAFT. Classified as Mesh, Surgical, Collagen, Diaphragmatic Hernia (product code OWV), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Cook Biotech, Inc. (West Lafayette, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 20, 2014 after a review of 268 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the General & Plastic Surgery FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 878.3300 - the FDA general and plastic surgery device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General & Plastic Surgery review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Cook Biotech, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K133011 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 25, 2013
Decision Date June 20, 2014
Days to Decision 268 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General & Plastic Surgery (SU)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
154d slower than avg
Panel avg: 114d · This submission: 268d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code OWV Mesh, Surgical, Collagen, Diaphragmatic Hernia
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 878.3300
Definition For Reinforcement Of Soft Tissue Where Weakness Exists During Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General & Plastic Surgery devices follow this clearance model.