Cleared Traditional

K133352 - HYPERSOUND AUDIO SYSTEM (HSS) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Ear, Nose, Throat device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2014
Decision
104d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K133352 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the HYPERSOUND AUDIO SYSTEM (HSS). Classified as Hearing Aid, Group And Auditory Trainer (product code EPF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Hypersound Health, Inc. (Poway, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 12, 2014 after a review of 104 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Ear, Nose, Throat FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 874.3320 - the FDA ear, nose and throat device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ear, Nose, Throat review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Hypersound Health, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K133352 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 31, 2013
Decision Date February 12, 2014
Days to Decision 104 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ear, Nose, Throat (EN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
15d slower than avg
Panel avg: 89d · This submission: 104d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EPF Hearing Aid, Group And Auditory Trainer
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 874.3320
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ear, Nose, Throat devices follow this clearance model.