Cleared Traditional

K140453 - OSTEOTEC SILICONE FINGER IMPLANT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Orthopedic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2015
Decision
417d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K140453 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the OSTEOTEC SILICONE FINGER IMPLANT. Classified as Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer (product code KYJ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Osteotec, Ltd. (Christchurch, Dorset, GB). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 17, 2015 after a review of 417 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Orthopedic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 888.3230 - the FDA orthopedic device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Orthopedic submissions.

View all Osteotec, Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K140453 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 24, 2014
Decision Date April 17, 2015
Days to Decision 417 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Orthopedic (OR)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
295d slower than avg
Panel avg: 122d · This submission: 417d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KYJ Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 888.3230
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Orthopedic devices follow this clearance model.