Cleared Traditional

BIOMET SIDE ACCESS DISTAL FEMORAL EXPANDABLE (K140509) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Orthopedic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2014
Decision
89d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K140509 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BIOMET SIDE ACCESS DISTAL FEMORAL EXPANDABLE. Classified as Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/polymer (product code KRO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Biomet Manufacturing, LLC (Warsaw, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 28, 2014 after a review of 89 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Orthopedic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 888.3510 - the FDA orthopedic device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Biomet Manufacturing, LLC devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K140509 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 28, 2014
Decision Date May 28, 2014
Days to Decision 89 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Orthopedic (OR)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
33d faster than avg
Panel avg: 122d · This submission: 89d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KRO Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/polymer
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 888.3510
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Orthopedic devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Peers - KRO Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/polymer

All 52
Devices cleared under the same product code (KRO) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K140509.
USTAR II System
K190100 · United Orthopedic Corporation · Sep 2019
GMK Hinge, GMK Revision
K172347 · Medacta International S.A. · Nov 2017
Zimmer Segmental System XT Components
K150028 · Zimmer, Inc. · Feb 2015
DISTAL FEMORAL GROWING PROSTHESIS, TIBIAL ROTATING COMPONENTS, BEARING, AXIS, CIRCLIP, WEDGE
K122015 · Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Feb 2013
ZIMMER SEGMENT SYSTEM TRABECULAR METAL PROXIMAL TIBIAL COMPONENT, TRABECULAR METAL PROXIMAL COMPONENT, ADDITIONAL SEGMEN
K110940 · Zimmer, Inc. · Jul 2011
LPS UNIVERSAL TIBIAL HINGE INSERTS, MODEL 198727012-198727331
K091453 · DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Aug 2009