Cleared Traditional

K141455 - EASYDRILL AUTOSTOP CRANIAL PERFORATOR (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2015
Decision
287d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K141455 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EASYDRILL AUTOSTOP CRANIAL PERFORATOR. Classified as Drills, Burrs, Trephines & Accessories (compound, Powered) (product code HBF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Micromar Ind. Com. , Ltd. (Fort Worth, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 16, 2015 after a review of 287 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.4305 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Micromar Ind. Com. , Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K141455 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 02, 2014
Decision Date March 16, 2015
Days to Decision 287 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
139d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 287d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HBF Drills, Burrs, Trephines & Accessories (compound, Powered)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.4305
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.