Cleared Traditional

K141928 - COBAS C ACETAMINOPHEN GEN.2 ASSAY, ACET2 CALIBRATOR (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2014
Decision
132d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K141928 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the COBAS C ACETAMINOPHEN GEN.2 ASSAY, ACET2 CALIBRATOR. Classified as Calibrators, Drug Mixture (product code DKB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Roche Diagnostics Operations (Rdo) (Indianapolis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 25, 2014 after a review of 132 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3200 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Roche Diagnostics Operations (Rdo) devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K141928 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 16, 2014
Decision Date November 25, 2014
Days to Decision 132 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
44d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 132d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DKB Calibrators, Drug Mixture
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3200
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.