Cleared Traditional

K142897 - P200DTx

K142897 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for P200DTx, manufactured by Optos Plc.. The device is a Class 2 Ophthalmic device with product code MYC cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 105-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2015
Decision
105d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K142897 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the P200DTx. Classified as Ophthalmoscope, Laser, Scanning (product code MYC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Optos Plc. (Dunfermline, GB). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 16, 2015 after a review of 105 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.1570 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ophthalmic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Optos Plc. devices

FDA 510(k) Submission Details - K142897

510(k) Number K142897 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 03, 2014
Decision Date January 16, 2015
Days to Decision 105 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
5d faster than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 105d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

MYC Device Classification - Class 2, Special Controls

Product Code MYC Ophthalmoscope, Laser, Scanning
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.1570
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.