Cleared Special

K153038 - Everest 20 Disposable Inflation Device, Everest 20 Survival Kit, Everest 30 Disposable Inflation Device, Everest 30 Survival Kit (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2016
Decision
177d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K153038 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Everest 20 Disposable Inflation Device, Everest 20 Survival Kit, Everest 30 D.... Classified as Syringe, Balloon Inflation (product code MAV), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medtronic, Inc. (Danvers, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 13, 2016 after a review of 177 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.1650 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Standard predicate reliance. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Medtronic, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K153038 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Special 510(k) (SESK)
Date Received October 19, 2015
Decision Date April 13, 2016
Days to Decision 177 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
52d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 177d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code MAV Syringe, Balloon Inflation
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.1650
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.