Cleared Traditional

Apogee 5500/Apogee 5300/ Apogee 5800 Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound Imaging System (K160853) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 2016
Decision
91d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K160853 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Apogee 5500/Apogee 5300/ Apogee 5800 Digital Color Doppler Ultrasound Imaging.... Classified as System, Imaging, Pulsed Doppler, Ultrasonic within the IYN classification (a category covering pulsed Doppler and ultrasound imaging systems), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Shantou Institute of Ultrasonic Instruments Co., Ltd. (Siui) (Shantou, CN). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 27, 2016 after a review of 91 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1550 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Shantou Institute of Ultrasonic Instruments Co., Ltd. (Siui) devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K160853 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 28, 2016
Decision Date June 27, 2016
Days to Decision 91 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
16d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 91d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code IYN System, Imaging, Pulsed Doppler, Ultrasonic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1550
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Peers - IYN System, Imaging, Pulsed Doppler, Ultrasonic

All 633
Devices cleared under the same product code (IYN) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K160853.
Resona 7/Resona 7CV/Resona 7EXP/Resona 7S/Resona 7OB Diagnostic Ultrasound System
K162267 · Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. · Sep 2016
ACUSON NX2 Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems
K161787 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Jul 2016
TE7 Diagnostic Ultrasound, TE5 Diagnostic Ultrasound System
K161525 · Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. · Jul 2016
LOGIQ P9 and LOGIQ P7
K161047 · Ge Healthcare · May 2016
Voluson P6, Voluson P8
K160162 · Ge Healthcare · Apr 2016
TE7 Diagnostic Ultrasound System
K160381 · Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. · Mar 2016