Cleared Traditional

K162275 - Randox RX Daytona Plus Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K162275 · Randox Laboratories Limited · Chemistry device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2017
Decision
252d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K162275 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Randox RX Daytona Plus Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP). Classified as Nitrophenylphosphate, Alkaline Phosphatase Or Isoenzymes (product code CJE), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Randox Laboratories Limited (Crumlin, GB). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 21, 2017 after a review of 252 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1050 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Randox Laboratories Limited devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K162275 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 12, 2016
Decision Date April 21, 2017
Days to Decision 252 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
164d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 252d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CJE Nitrophenylphosphate, Alkaline Phosphatase Or Isoenzymes
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1050
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.