Cleared Traditional

K162544 - OsteoMed PINNACLE Driver

K162544 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for OsteoMed PINNACLE Driver, manufactured by Osteomed. The device is a Class 2 Dental device with product code KMW cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 204-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2017
Decision
204d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K162544 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the OsteoMed PINNACLE Driver. Classified as Handpiece, Rotary Bone Cutting (product code KMW), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Osteomed (Addison, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 4, 2017 after a review of 204 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.4120 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Osteomed devices

FDA 510(k) Submission Details - K162544

510(k) Number K162544 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 12, 2016
Decision Date April 04, 2017
Days to Decision 204 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
77d slower than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 204d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

KMW Device Classification - Class 2, Special Controls

Product Code KMW Handpiece, Rotary Bone Cutting
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.4120
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.