Cleared Traditional

K163171 - CeraClean (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2017
Decision
151d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K163171 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CeraClean. Classified as External Cleaning Solution (product code PME), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Bisco, Inc. (Schaumburg, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 14, 2017 after a review of 151 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3260 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Bisco, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K163171 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 14, 2016
Decision Date April 14, 2017
Days to Decision 151 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
24d slower than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 151d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code PME External Cleaning Solution
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3260
Definition For Use On Dental Restorations, External To The Mouth, Prior To Insertion Into The Mouth.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.