Cleared Traditional

MAZIC Duro (K163346) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K163346 · Vericom Co., Ltd. · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 2017
Decision
108d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K163346 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MAZIC Duro. Classified as Material, Tooth Shade, Resin (product code EBF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Vericom Co., Ltd. (Chuncheon-Si, KR). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 17, 2017 after a review of 108 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3690 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Dental review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Vericom Co., Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K163346 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 29, 2016
Decision Date March 17, 2017
Days to Decision 108 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
19d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 108d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EBF Material, Tooth Shade, Resin
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3690
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.