Cleared Traditional

ELAN 4 Air Motor System (K172907) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2018
Decision
410d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K172907 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ELAN 4 Air Motor System. Classified as Motor, Drill, Pneumatic (product code HBB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Aesculap, Inc. (Center Valley, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 9, 2018 after a review of 410 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.4370 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Neurology submissions.

View all Aesculap, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K172907 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 25, 2017
Decision Date November 09, 2018
Days to Decision 410 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
262d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 410d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HBB Motor, Drill, Pneumatic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.4370
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.