Cleared Traditional

K173093 - TAMA BEMS device

K173093 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for TAMA BEMS device by Tama Research Corporation. It is a Class 2 Neurology device (product code NFO) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 249-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 2018
Decision
249d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K173093 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TAMA BEMS device. Classified as Stimulator, Transcutaneous Electrical, Aesthetic Purposes (product code NFO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Tama Research Corporation (Phoenix, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 5, 2018 after a review of 249 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5890 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Tama Research Corporation devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K173093 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 29, 2017
Decision Date June 05, 2018
Days to Decision 249 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
101d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 249d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code NFO Stimulator, Transcutaneous Electrical, Aesthetic Purposes
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5890
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

Medical Devices Academy, Inc.
Robert Packard

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.

Regulatory Peers - NFO Stimulator, Transcutaneous Electrical, Aesthetic Purposes

All 50
Devices cleared under the same product code (NFO) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K173093.
NuFACE FIX Skin Toning Device
K182424 · Carol Cole Company Dba Nuface · Dec 2018
NuFACE Trinity
K181008 · Carol Cole Company Dba Nuface · Oct 2018
Ultra Facial Toning System
K181062 · Micro Current Technology, Inc. · Jul 2018
2 Face / Face Evolution
K171821 · Heat IN A Click · Apr 2018