Cleared Traditional

K181223 - ImPACT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2018
Decision
165d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K181223 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ImPACT. Classified as Computerized Cognitive Assessment Aid For Concussion (product code POM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Impact Applications, Inc. (San Diego, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 20, 2018 after a review of 165 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.1471 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Impact Applications, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K181223 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 08, 2018
Decision Date October 20, 2018
Days to Decision 165 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
17d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 165d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code POM Computerized Cognitive Assessment Aid For Concussion
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.1471
Definition For Use As An Assessment Aid In The Management Of Concussion.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.