Cleared Traditional

K181566 - Nutrifill (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K181566 · Contamac, Ltd. · Ophthalmic device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2018
Decision
130d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K181566 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Nutrifill. Classified as Products, Contact Lens Care, Rigid Gas Permeable (product code MRC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Contamac, Ltd. (Saffron Walden, GB). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 22, 2018 after a review of 130 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.5918 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ophthalmic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Contamac, Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K181566 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 14, 2018
Decision Date October 22, 2018
Days to Decision 130 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
20d slower than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 130d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MRC Products, Contact Lens Care, Rigid Gas Permeable
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.5918
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.