Cleared Traditional

K182353 - EliA CENP Immunoassay, EliA U1RNP Immunoassay, EliA RNP70 Immunoassay (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2018
Decision
90d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K182353 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EliA CENP Immunoassay, EliA U1RNP Immunoassay, EliA RNP70 Immunoassay. Classified as Antinuclear Antibody (enzyme-labeled), Antigen, Controls (product code LJM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Phadia AB (Uppsala, SE). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 27, 2018 after a review of 90 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5100 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Phadia AB devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K182353 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 29, 2018
Decision Date November 27, 2018
Days to Decision 90 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
14d faster than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 90d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LJM Antinuclear Antibody (enzyme-labeled), Antigen, Controls
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5100
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

Phadia US, Inc.
Sheryl Skinner

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.