Cleared Traditional

K182518 - AHMED ClearPath Glaucoma Drainage Device (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K182518 · New World Medical, Inc. · Ophthalmic device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 2019
Decision
127d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K182518 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the AHMED ClearPath Glaucoma Drainage Device. Classified as Implant, Eye Valve (product code KYF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by New World Medical, Inc. (Rancho Cucamonga, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 18, 2019 after a review of 127 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.3920 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ophthalmic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all New World Medical, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K182518 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 13, 2018
Decision Date January 18, 2019
Days to Decision 127 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
17d slower than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 127d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KYF Implant, Eye Valve
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.3920
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.