Cleared Traditional

K182702 - SEKURE Creatine Kinase Assay (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2019
Decision
202d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K182702 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SEKURE Creatine Kinase Assay. Classified as Nad Reduction/nadh Oxidation, Cpk Or Isoenzymes (product code CGS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Sekisui Diagnostics P.E.I., Inc. (Charlottetown,, CA). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 17, 2019 after a review of 202 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1215 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Sekisui Diagnostics P.E.I., Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K182702 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 27, 2018
Decision Date April 17, 2019
Days to Decision 202 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
114d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 202d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CGS Nad Reduction/nadh Oxidation, Cpk Or Isoenzymes
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1215
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.