Cleared Traditional

K182874 - Fenom Pro Nitric Oxide Test

K182874 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for Fenom Pro Nitric Oxide Test by Spirosure, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Chemistry device (product code MXA) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 124-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2019
Decision
124d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K182874 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Fenom Pro Nitric Oxide Test. Classified as System, Test, Breath Nitric Oxide (product code MXA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Spirosure, Inc. (Pleasanton, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 13, 2019 after a review of 124 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3080 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Spirosure, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K182874 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 12, 2018
Decision Date February 13, 2019
Days to Decision 124 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
36d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 124d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MXA System, Test, Breath Nitric Oxide
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3080
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.