Cleared Traditional

K190925 - HeartFlow FFRct Analysis (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2019
Decision
128d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K190925 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the HeartFlow FFRct Analysis. Classified as Coronary Vascular Physiologic Simulation Software (product code PJA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by HeartFlow, Inc. (Redwood City, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 15, 2019 after a review of 128 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.1415 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all HeartFlow, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K190925 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 09, 2019
Decision Date August 15, 2019
Days to Decision 128 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
3d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 128d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code PJA Coronary Vascular Physiologic Simulation Software
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.1415
Definition A Coronary Vascular Physiologic Simulation Software Device Is Intended To Aid In The Identification Of Functionally Significant Cardiovascular Disease.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.