Cleared Traditional

InMode System with Tone Applicator (K192249) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Physical Medicine device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2019
Decision
120d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K192249 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the InMode System with Tone Applicator. Classified as Stimulator, Muscle, Powered (product code IPF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Inmode , Ltd. (Yokneam, IL). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 17, 2019 after a review of 120 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Physical Medicine FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 890.5850 - the FDA physical medicine device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Physical Medicine review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Inmode , Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K192249 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 19, 2019
Decision Date December 17, 2019
Days to Decision 120 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Physical Medicine (PM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
5d slower than avg
Panel avg: 115d · This submission: 120d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 890.5850
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Physical Medicine devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

A. Stein-Regulatory Affaris Consulting , Ltd.
Amit Goren

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.

Regulatory Peers - IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered

All 72
Devices cleared under the same product code (IPF) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K192249.
geko™ W-2
K193045 · Firstkind Limited · Jan 2020
TENS and EMS Stimulator, TENS Stimulator
K183074 · Astek Technology , Ltd. · Jan 2020
RelieforMe TENS/EMS Device Model UPK-GE01
K192733 · Umeheal , Ltd. · Dec 2019
geko T-2 and geko T-3 Neuromuscular Stimulators
K191113 · Firstkind Limited · Sep 2019
Shear Stress Therapeutics SST 3000
K182163 · Shear Stress Therapeutics, LLC · Jul 2019
PowerDot PD-01MT
K181759 · Smartmissimo Technologies Pte, Ltd. · Nov 2018