Cleared Traditional

K193514 - AUTION MAX AX-4060 Urinalysis System (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 2023
Decision
1211d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K193514 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the AUTION MAX AX-4060 Urinalysis System. Classified as Method, Enzymatic, Glucose (urinary, Non-quantitative) (product code JIL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Arkray, Inc. (Kamigyo-Ku, JP). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 13, 2023 after a review of 1211 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1340 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Chemistry submissions.

View all Arkray, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K193514 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 19, 2019
Decision Date April 13, 2023
Days to Decision 1211 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
1123d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 1211d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JIL Method, Enzymatic, Glucose (urinary, Non-quantitative)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1340
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

Arkray Factory USA, Inc.
Daya Ranamukhaarachchi

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.