Cleared Traditional

K200073 - AugMENTA Penile Implant (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General & Plastic Surgery device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K200073 · Augmenta, LLC · General & Plastic Surgery device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2022
Decision
990d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K200073 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the AugMENTA Penile Implant. Classified as Elastomer, Silicone Block (product code MIB), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Augmenta, LLC (Houston, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 30, 2022 after a review of 990 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the General & Plastic Surgery FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 874.3620 - the FDA general and plastic surgery device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind General & Plastic Surgery submissions.

View all Augmenta, LLC devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K200073 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 14, 2020
Decision Date September 30, 2022
Days to Decision 990 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General & Plastic Surgery (SU)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
876d slower than avg
Panel avg: 114d · This submission: 990d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MIB Elastomer, Silicone Block
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 874.3620
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General & Plastic Surgery devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

DuVal & Associates, P.A.
Lisa L. Pritchard

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.