Cleared Traditional

Tenax Laser Resistant Endotracheal Tube (K200761) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 2020
Decision
246d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K200761 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Tenax Laser Resistant Endotracheal Tube. Classified as Tube, Tracheal (w/wo Connector) (product code BTR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Bryan Medical, Inc. (Cincinnati, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 25, 2020 after a review of 246 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5730 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Bryan Medical, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K200761 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 24, 2020
Decision Date November 25, 2020
Days to Decision 246 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
106d slower than avg
Panel avg: 140d · This submission: 246d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code BTR Tube, Tracheal (w/wo Connector)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5730
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

AlvaMed, Inc.
Ian Broome

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.

Regulatory Peers - BTR Tube, Tracheal (w/wo Connector)

All 39
Devices cleared under the same product code (BTR) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K200761.
Shiley™ Pediatric Oral/Nasal Endotracheal Tube with TaperGuard™ Cuff, Non DEHP (86125, 86130, 86135, 86140, 86145, 86150, 86155, 86160)
K223130 · Covidien · Aug 2023
Wei Nasal Jet Tube
K211543 · Well Lead Medical Co., Ltd. · Jul 2022
Tenax Laser Resistant Endotracheal Tube
K213028 · Bryan Medical, Inc. · Oct 2021
Venner PneuX™ ETT (Endotracheal Tube) 6 mm, Venner PneuX™ ETT (Endotracheal Tube) 7 mm, Venner PneuX™ ETT (Endotracheal Tube) 8 mm, Venner PneuX™ ETT (Endotracheal Tube) 9 mm
K192120 · Venner Medical (Singapore) Pte, Ltd. · Feb 2020
Trach- Vac Endotracheal Tube (SFTVPU) Subglottic Suction Tube with Salter Flex-Tip and Salter ThinCuff, Trach- Vac Endotracheal Tube (SFTVVC) Subglottic Suction Tube with Salter Flex-Tip and Salter ThinCuff
K190878 · Salter Labs, Inc. · Jan 2020
Endotracheal Tube with Evacuation Lumen
K182739 · Well Lead Medical Co., Ltd. · Dec 2019