Cleared Traditional

K201089 - ARK Lacosamide Assay (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Toxicology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 2021
Decision
469d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K201089 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ARK Lacosamide Assay. Classified as Immunoassay, Anti-seizure Drug (product code NWM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by ARK Diagnostics, Inc. (Fremont, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 5, 2021 after a review of 469 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3350 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Toxicology submissions.

View all ARK Diagnostics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K201089 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 23, 2020
Decision Date August 05, 2021
Days to Decision 469 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
382d slower than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 469d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code NWM Immunoassay, Anti-seizure Drug
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3350
Definition To Aid In Management Of Patients Treated With Anti-seizure Drug.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.