Cleared Traditional

K201309 - ECT Cotton Bite Block- size Large, ECT Cotton Bite Block -size Medium (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 2021
Decision
385d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K201309 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ECT Cotton Bite Block- size Large, ECT Cotton Bite Block -size Medium. Classified as Block, Bite (product code JXL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Mecta Corporation (Tualatin, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 4, 2021 after a review of 385 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5070 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Mecta Corporation devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K201309 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 15, 2020
Decision Date June 04, 2021
Days to Decision 385 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
237d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 385d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JXL Block, Bite
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5070
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.