Cleared Traditional

K201697 - Umbilical Vessels Catheter (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2021
Decision
318d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K201697 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Umbilical Vessels Catheter. Classified as Catheter, Umbilical Artery (product code FOS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Haolang Medical USA Corporation (Bellevue, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 6, 2021 after a review of 318 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5200 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Haolang Medical USA Corporation devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K201697 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 22, 2020
Decision Date May 06, 2021
Days to Decision 318 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
190d slower than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 318d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code FOS Catheter, Umbilical Artery
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5200
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

Shenzhen Joyantech Consulting Co., Ltd.
Field Fu

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.