Cleared Traditional

K201906 - Trinity ELE Plus and Trinity ELE Plus Pro (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 2021
Decision
230d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K201906 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Trinity ELE Plus and Trinity ELE Plus Pro. Classified as Stimulator, Transcutaneous Electrical, Aesthetic Purposes (product code NFO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Carol Cole Company Dba Nuface (Vista, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 24, 2021 after a review of 230 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5890 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Carol Cole Company Dba Nuface devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K201906 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 09, 2020
Decision Date February 24, 2021
Days to Decision 230 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
82d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 230d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code NFO Stimulator, Transcutaneous Electrical, Aesthetic Purposes
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5890
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

Bob Duffy Associates, Inc.
Bob Duffy

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.

Regulatory Peers - NFO Stimulator, Transcutaneous Electrical, Aesthetic Purposes

All 74
Devices cleared under the same product code (NFO) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K201906.
Multi-functional Facial Beauty Device ( SKB-1703,SKB-1803,SKB-1909, SKB-2003 SKB-2109,SKB-2129,SKB-2208PRO, SKB-2209)
K252146 · Shenzhen Siken 3D Technology Development Co., Ltd. · Dec 2025
Aura Glide (FC40)
K252187 · Aura Medical, LLC · Dec 2025
Medi Lift Essential Eye Mask
K250618 · Ya-Man, Ltd. · Oct 2025
JOVS Electric Stimulation Beauty Device (JE2)
K250227 · Shenzhen Qianyu Technology Co., Ltd. · Oct 2025
Radiant Renewal Skincare Lid (HD-59A, HD-59B, HD-70)
K251034 · Shenzhen Nuon Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. · Oct 2025
Facial & Body Beauty Device (INIA-BD001, INIA-BD002, INIA-BD003, INIA-BD004, F2C15, F3222 Pro, F5516, F3606, F2210 Pro, F5808, INIA-ED001, INIA-ED002, INIA-BLD001, E1507)
K252553 · Shenzhen Jianchao Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. · Oct 2025