Cleared Traditional

K203409 - MC3 Crescent Jugular Dual Lumen Catheter (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2021
Decision
165d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K203409 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MC3 Crescent Jugular Dual Lumen Catheter. Classified as Dual Lumen Ecmo Cannula (product code PZS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Mc3, Inc. (Dexter, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 3, 2021 after a review of 165 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.4100 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Mc3, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K203409 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 19, 2020
Decision Date May 03, 2021
Days to Decision 165 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
40d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 165d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code PZS Dual Lumen Ecmo Cannula
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.4100
Definition Long Term Support Greater Than 6 Hours For Acute Respiratory Or Acute Cardiopulmonary Failure, Where Other Available Treatment Options Have Failed, And Continued Clinical Deterioration Is Expected Or The Risk Of Death Is Imminent.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.