Cleared Traditional

Tango, Tango Reflex, Ultra Q, Ultra Q Reflex, Solo (K212630) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 2021
Decision
119d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K212630 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Tango, Tango Reflex, Ultra Q, Ultra Q Reflex, Solo. Classified as Laser, Ophthalmic (product code HQF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Ellex Medical Pty, Ltd. (Adelaide, AU). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 16, 2021 after a review of 119 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.4390 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ophthalmic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Ellex Medical Pty, Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K212630 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 19, 2021
Decision Date December 16, 2021
Days to Decision 119 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
9d slower than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 119d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HQF Laser, Ophthalmic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.4390
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

O'Connell Regulatory Consultants, Inc.
Maureen O'Connell

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.

Regulatory Peers - HQF Laser, Ophthalmic

All 29
Devices cleared under the same product code (HQF) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K212630.
Selecta Duet LED, Digital Duet, Selecta LED Trio, Digital Trio Laser Systems
K220877 · Lumenis Be, Inc. · Jul 2022
Capsulo
K220430 · Quantel Medical · May 2022
Iridex 810 Laser
K213592 · Iridex Corporation · Mar 2022
Ophthalmic Yag Laser System YC-200
K203130 · Nidek Co., Ltd. · Dec 2020
Iridex 810 Laser
K202760 · Iridex Corporation · Oct 2020
LION Photocoagulator
K201623 · Norlase Aps · Aug 2020