Cleared Traditional

K221601 - MS-39 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 2023
Decision
456d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K221601 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MS-39. Classified as Tomography, Optical Coherence (product code OBO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by C.S.O. S.R.L. (Scandicci, IT). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 1, 2023 after a review of 456 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.1570 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Ophthalmic submissions.

View all C.S.O. S.R.L. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K221601 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 02, 2022
Decision Date September 01, 2023
Days to Decision 456 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
346d slower than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 456d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code OBO Tomography, Optical Coherence
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.1570
Definition Viewing, Imaging, Measurement, And Analysis Of Ocular Structures. Diagnostic Device To Aid In The Detection And Management Of Various Ocular Diseases.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

THEMA S.r.l.
Marisa Testa

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.

Regulatory Peers - OBO Tomography, Optical Coherence

All 64
Devices cleared under the same product code (OBO) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K221601.
UNITY DX (UDX)
K252633 · Cylite Pty. , Ltd. · Dec 2025
Tomey Cornea/Anterior Segment OCT (CASIA2)
K250553 · Tomey Corporation · Jul 2025
SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT and variants
K250868 · Heidelberg Engineering GmbH · May 2025
Anterion
K240924 · Heidelberg Engineering GmbH · Dec 2024
SPECTRALIS with Flex Module
K241163 · Heidelberg Engineering GmbH · Oct 2024
3D OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY 3D OCT-1 (type: Maestro2)
K241081 · Topcon Corporation · Jul 2024