Cleared Traditional

K222201 - Biological Feedback and Stimulation System (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Physical Medicine device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 2022
Decision
88d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K222201 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the Biological Feedback and Stimulation System. Classified as Stimulator, Muscle, Powered (product code IPF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medlander Medical Technology, Inc. (Nanjing, CN). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 21, 2022 after a review of 88 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Physical Medicine FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 890.5850 - the FDA physical medicine device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Medlander Medical Technology, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K222201 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 25, 2022
Decision Date October 21, 2022
Days to Decision 88 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Physical Medicine (PM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
27d faster than avg
Panel avg: 115d · This submission: 88d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 890.5850
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Physical Medicine devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

Chonconn Medical Device Consulting Co., Ltd.
Kevin Wang

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.

Regulatory Peers - IPF Stimulator, Muscle, Powered

All 544
Devices cleared under the same product code (IPF) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K222201.
Compact II
K251083 · Enraf-Nonius, B.V. · Sep 2025
EVE Synergy (EVE-20M)
K241433 · Weero Co., Ltd. · Jun 2025
TrainFES Advance
K241488 · Trainfes · Feb 2025
Quantum Mitohormesis (QMT) (M2101)
K240348 · Quantumtx Pte. , Ltd. · Dec 2024
eMVFit (MVF-10M)
K240992 · Weero Co., Ltd. · Oct 2024
BTL-899MS
K240234 · BTL Industries, Inc. · Aug 2024