Cleared Traditional

K232788 - INSPIRA ART100 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 2024
Decision
256d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K232788 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the INSPIRA ART100. Classified as Control, Pump Speed, Cardiopulmonary Bypass (product code DWA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Inspira Technologies Oxy B.H.N. , Ltd. (Ra’Anana, IL). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 24, 2024 after a review of 256 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.4380 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Inspira Technologies Oxy B.H.N. , Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K232788 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 11, 2023
Decision Date May 24, 2024
Days to Decision 256 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
131d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 256d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DWA Control, Pump Speed, Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.4380
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Consultant

MCRA
Fernando Aguel

The regulatory consultant manages the 510(k) submission process on behalf of the applicant - coordinating technical documentation, predicate strategy and FDA communications. Identifying the consultant behind a submission is a key signal for competitive regulatory intelligence.