Cleared Traditional

K760122 - WILL-CERAM Y-2

K760122 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for WILL-CERAM Y-2, manufactured by Williams Gold Refining Co., Inc.. The device is a Class 2 Dental device with product code EJT cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 18-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1976
Decision
18d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K760122 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the WILL-CERAM Y-2. Classified as Alloy, Gold-based Noble Metal (product code EJT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Williams Gold Refining Co., Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 16, 1976 after a review of 18 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3060 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Williams Gold Refining Co., Inc. devices

FDA 510(k) Submission Details - K760122

510(k) Number K760122 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 28, 1976
Decision Date July 16, 1976
Days to Decision 18 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
109d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 18d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

EJT Device Classification - Class 2, Special Controls

Product Code EJT Alloy, Gold-based Noble Metal
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3060
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.