Cleared Traditional

TERASAKI LYMPHOCYTE TRANSPORT KIT (K760952) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1977
Decision
76d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K760952 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TERASAKI LYMPHOCYTE TRANSPORT KIT. Classified as Container, Empty, For Collection & Processing Of Blood & Blood Components (product code KSR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Dravon Medical, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 17, 1977 after a review of 76 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.9100 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Dravon Medical, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K760952 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 02, 1976
Decision Date January 17, 1977
Days to Decision 76 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
37d faster than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 76d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KSR Container, Empty, For Collection & Processing Of Blood & Blood Components
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.9100
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.