Cleared Traditional

K770923 - ESPETEMP (TEMP. CEMENT)

K770923 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for ESPETEMP (TEMP. CEMENT) by Espe GmbH (Us). It is a Class 2 Dental device (product code EMA) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 12-day FDA review.

K770923 · Espe GmbH (Us) · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1977
Decision
12d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K770923 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ESPETEMP (TEMP. CEMENT). Classified as Cement, Dental (product code EMA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Espe GmbH (Us) (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 1, 1977 after a review of 12 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3275 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Espe GmbH (Us) devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K770923 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 20, 1977
Decision Date June 01, 1977
Days to Decision 12 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
115d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 12d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EMA Cement, Dental
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3275
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.