Cleared Traditional

K781349 - PACER-TRACER PULSE WIDTH

K781349 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for PACER-TRACER PULSE WIDTH by Instromedix, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Cardiovascular device (product code DTC) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 24-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 1978
Decision
24d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K781349 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PACER-TRACER PULSE WIDTH. Classified as Analyzer, Pacemaker Generator Function (product code DTC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Instromedix, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 31, 1978 after a review of 24 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.3630 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Instromedix, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K781349 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 07, 1978
Decision Date August 31, 1978
Days to Decision 24 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
101d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 24d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DTC Analyzer, Pacemaker Generator Function
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.3630
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.