Cleared Traditional

K781641 - SURGITEK DOUBLE J URETEROL STENT

K781641 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for SURGITEK DOUBLE J URETEROL STENT by Medical Engineering Corp.. It is a Class 2 Gastroenterology & Urology device (product code FAD) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 77-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1978
Decision
77d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K781641 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SURGITEK DOUBLE J URETEROL STENT. Classified as Stent, Ureteral (product code FAD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medical Engineering Corp. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 7, 1978 after a review of 77 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.4620 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Medical Engineering Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K781641 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 21, 1978
Decision Date December 07, 1978
Days to Decision 77 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
53d faster than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 77d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code FAD Stent, Ureteral
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.4620
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.