Cleared Traditional

K781706 - RESPIRATOR/GILL 1/SIMV (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1979
Decision
104d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K781706 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the RESPIRATOR/GILL 1/SIMV. Classified as Attachment, Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (imv) (product code CBO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Chemetron Medical Products, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 22, 1979 after a review of 104 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5955 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Chemetron Medical Products, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K781706 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 10, 1978
Decision Date January 22, 1979
Days to Decision 104 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
35d faster than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 104d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CBO Attachment, Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation (imv)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5955
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.