Cleared Traditional

K781749 - TUBING, AXIOM SILICONE PENROSE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1978
Decision
48d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K781749 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TUBING, AXIOM SILICONE PENROSE. Classified as Catheter (gastric, Colonic, Etc.), Irrigation And Aspiration (product code KDH), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Axiom Medical, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 4, 1978 after a review of 48 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.5980 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Axiom Medical, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K781749 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 17, 1978
Decision Date December 04, 1978
Days to Decision 48 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
82d faster than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 48d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KDH Catheter (gastric, Colonic, Etc.), Irrigation And Aspiration
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.5980
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.