Cleared Traditional

K782065 - LASER

K782065 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for LASER by Cavitron Corp.. It is a Class 2 Ophthalmic device (product code HQF) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 15-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1978
Decision
15d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K782065 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the LASER, PHOTOCOAGULATION. Classified as Laser, Ophthalmic (product code HQF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Cavitron Corp. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 28, 1978 after a review of 15 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.4390 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Cavitron Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K782065 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 13, 1978
Decision Date December 28, 1978
Days to Decision 15 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
95d faster than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 15d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HQF Laser, Ophthalmic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.4390
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.