Cleared Traditional

K790040 - P.A.P. TEST KIT, RIA-ZYME (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1979
Decision
99d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K790040 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the P.A.P. TEST KIT, RIA-ZYME. Classified as Acid Phosphatase (prostatic), Tartrate Inhibited (product code JFH), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Mallinckrodt Critical Care (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 17, 1979 after a review of 99 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1020 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Mallinckrodt Critical Care devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K790040 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 08, 1979
Decision Date April 17, 1979
Days to Decision 99 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
11d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 99d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JFH Acid Phosphatase (prostatic), Tartrate Inhibited
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1020
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.