Cleared Traditional

TEST KIT, IIF-AMA (K790295) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K790295 · Medica Corp. · Immunology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1979
Decision
105d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K790295 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TEST KIT, IIF-AMA. Classified as Antimitochondrial Antibody, Indirect Immunofluorescent, Antigen, Control (product code DBM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medica Corp. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 25, 1979 after a review of 105 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5090 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Medica Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K790295 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 09, 1979
Decision Date May 25, 1979
Days to Decision 105 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
1d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 105d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DBM Antimitochondrial Antibody, Indirect Immunofluorescent, Antigen, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5090
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.