Cleared Traditional

K790948 - TEMP-GUARD TM

K790948 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for TEMP-GUARD TM, manufactured by Gordon Consultants, Inc.. The device is a Class 2 General Hospital device with product code FMT cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 126-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1979
Decision
126d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K790948 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TEMP-GUARD TM. Classified as Warmer, Infant Radiant (product code FMT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Gordon Consultants, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 24, 1979 after a review of 126 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5130 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Gordon Consultants, Inc. devices

FDA 510(k) Submission Details - K790948

510(k) Number K790948 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 21, 1979
Decision Date September 24, 1979
Days to Decision 126 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
3d faster than avg
Panel avg: 129d · This submission: 126d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

FMT Device Classification - Class 2, Special Controls

Product Code FMT Warmer, Infant Radiant
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5130
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.