Cleared Traditional

CEREBRAL FUNCTION MONITOR 870 (K791580) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1979
Decision
18d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K791580 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CEREBRAL FUNCTION MONITOR 870. Classified as Amplitude-integrated Electroencephalograph (product code OMA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Applied Medical Research (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 4, 1979 after a review of 18 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.1400 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Applied Medical Research devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K791580 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 17, 1979
Decision Date September 04, 1979
Days to Decision 18 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
130d faster than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 18d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code OMA Amplitude-integrated Electroencephalograph
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.1400
Definition Measure And Record Electrical Activity Of The Brain By Acquisition Of Amplitude-integrated Electroencephalograph (electroencephalograph Signals That Have Been Filtered And Displayed In A Specific Manner).
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.