Cleared Traditional

K791793 - USCI PRESSURE GAUGE

K791793 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for USCI PRESSURE GAUGE by C.R. Bard, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Cardiovascular device (product code DXT) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 88-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1979
Decision
88d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K791793 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the USCI PRESSURE GAUGE. Classified as Injector And Syringe, Angiographic (product code DXT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by C.R. Bard, Inc. (Chelmsford, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 11, 1979 after a review of 88 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.1650 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all C.R. Bard, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K791793 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 14, 1979
Decision Date December 11, 1979
Days to Decision 88 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
37d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 88d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DXT Injector And Syringe, Angiographic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.1650
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.