Cleared Traditional

K791907 - RETARD VALVE 3-STACK #M-515

K791907 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for RETARD VALVE 3-STACK #M-515 by Mem Medical, Inc.. It is a Class 2 Anesthesiology device (product code CBP) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 14-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 1979
Decision
14d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K791907 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the RETARD VALVE 3-STACK #M-515. Classified as Valve, Non-rebreathing (product code CBP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Mem Medical, Inc. (Mchenry, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 9, 1979 after a review of 14 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5870 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Mem Medical, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K791907 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 25, 1979
Decision Date October 09, 1979
Days to Decision 14 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
126d faster than avg
Panel avg: 140d · This submission: 14d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CBP Valve, Non-rebreathing
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5870
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.